Same-sex Marriage and “Gay” Politics: So Wrong in So Many Ways

Same-sex Marriage and "Gay" Politics: So Wrong in So Many Ways

by James A. Bridge

In the year 2011 we see a society and a national government in the United States in complete convulsion and in conflict with its larger self.

New York's Governor Mario Cuomo is prepared to sign into law the redefinition of marriage in the Empire State. The state's motto is, translated from Latin, "Higher, Higher!" I don't think New York's legislature has any problem being high, but I'm sure the "excelsior" motto was not intended for tokers and other drug abusers. New Yorkers deserve far better from their government than they have received at the hands of these bankrupting dastards and reflex-liberal ne'er-do-wells.

The pacific ocean of a complacent and tolerant majority culture and religion has eructed forth a bilious tidal wave of contrary impulse, at a time when Americans chose its national leader and legislatures poorly. This wave would alter the landscape of the society through a synchronously biased news and entertainment message, through control of the national political order, and even in the pews of synagogues and churches across the country.

Perhaps the most offensive of these is the "Gay" political movement and the push for same-sex marriage. And perhaps the most telling flaw in a permissive society is permitting that to continue which would destroy that lenient majority.

The goal of gays has demonstrable intensified to not just being left alone, and to be free of prosecution under blue laws that define sexual conduct. The goal is now two-fold: One, to change the nature of their sexual proclivities by redefining and destroying the heterosexual world, what its definitions are, and what is paramount to its continuation. Two, to get their barefaced lie of "as normal as you" into public schools. And they are succeeding.

Under the guise of protecting gays from bullying, gay awareness is being pushed into sex-education classes, and in special assemblies. Federal programs drive this, and under the 111^th Congress, run by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, there is no surprise—she regularly takes money from the Man Boy Love Association. You could check it out and find I'm right.

Why is that wrong, some of you may ask, for a politician to take money from a group that espouses statutory rape? Could there be anything more obviously wrong? Starkist also contributes to Pelosi; one would wonder, what do Starkist and statutory rape have in common?

They have a corrupt politician in common, who should be excommunicated from her place of worship, so vilely amoral is she. She is, however, a news media sacred cow. Imagine a Republican taking money from such a loathsome group! But we are on to you, Nancy, and all of your pals.

Gay as a political movement is wrong, because it drives a political agenda at preteens and teenagers. No political movement of any kind is truly appropriate in public schools, other than allegiance to one's state and country. Forcing that conversation about homosexuality upon our prepubescent young is inappropriate and serves no purpose other than to assuage a segment of society that is obsessed with its own sexuality.

The "Gay" political movement is in and of itself an affront to society. Not the fact of homosexuality: humans produce a certain number of sexually disoriented people. Our system of law and the political culture of the United States of America is tolerant of different. I, for one, refuse to pass judgment. However, there can be no political movement centered around a sex act; or rather, any such political movement is inherently ridiculous and inappropriate. Homosexual people don't all see the world from a genital point of view, but in evidence is the preponderance of in-your-face political ideology that is often intended to offend members of the heterosexual majority.

Would you like the proof of the argument I make? Here it is: There will NEVER be a heterosexual political movement based upon having sex a certain way.

Why?

Because it is NOBODY'S BUSINESS, and we don't want to hear about it from you, either, homo- or heterosexually. These kinds of conversions are inherently intimate, and should never be broadcast. The homosexual political movement and agenda is actually by definition pornographic.

The further affront of such a political movement is to drive the political discussion into the minds of the young. The forces of "Gay" have as a goal Public Schools. You could ask our President's "Safe Schools" czar Kevin Jennings, who has recently resigned (probably to avoid being further negative ballast for the President's re-election bid). There will be "Safe School" legislation that is in fact a Trojan Horse for "gay awareness" teaching and for "anti-gay" bullying. Children who are not homosexual will have to confront sexuality long before they need to have to think about it, all so that this sex-act-centric political movement can put the fact of its own homosexual identity on full display before them.

Nor is the discussion of same-sex marriage about equality. Marriage is ancient, it is sacred, it is understood globally as heterosexual, embraced my many, eschewed by few, and not all succeed or lead to happiness. Marriage is the expression of the normal, human desire for other-sex companionship. Whether that union produces offspring is not germane: that is marriage. Marriage is also sacred before God, if you believe in God. If you don't, one would hope you would think a little deeper about the insignificance of the world, in the context of an infinitely expanding universe of which in comparison we are but specks on a speck of wet space dust.

Homosexual activists are not content to be different; that is the over-weening purpose of the gay marriage movement. They want to alter the majority society in its own image. They no longer want to be a minority, or a subset of humanity. What they fail to grasp is that they will always be, as they always have been, different. And many homosexual people, due to their other-orientation, have personalities that do not fit in well with others who are not homosexual. Gay people will admit this to themselves, certainly.

The Gay Marriage movement is also a lie: Homosexual people can very easily "marry." All one has to do is find a gay-friendly or an actually homosexual priest or rabbi, and a competent lawyer. Sign mutual power-of-attorney documents and enter them in the court records, step one. Step two, have a blessing performed, and choose your setting. Invite me, I'll even bring a present! There, you have it: a homosexual union that is as binding as you want it to be.

But Americans know that politics and sex don't mix well. Go ask Anthony Weiner....Jim McGreevey...John Edwards...Bill Clinton...and on, and on, and on.

Anyone with either a finger to the wind or an ear to the ground knows that the formerly permissive great majority of Americans are at an end of patience. The now completely exposed animus of the forces of big government in partnership with a corrupted news and entertainment media, of the forces of anti-Jewish, anti-Christian religion and immorality generally has created a coiling backlash that certainly will reach epic proportions.

Fast forward to 2012. See you in the streets on November 7^th.

Legislative Testing

An Idea Whose Time has Come
Legislation Testing
by James Andrew Bridge

How many legislators could pass a test on the United States Constitution? On their own state Constitution? How many could pass a test on legislation they vote on?

Don't you think they should be able to? Or are we condemned to vote for politicians who are ignorant of our Constitution, and who don't give a damn about what their legislation will do to us and our children?

We all watched as the 111th Congress quadrupled the debt—after excoriating the previous President for his modest one—to a real number of $14 trillion, or $186,000 per household. We watched as the that Congress in concert with our President Obama stripped us of our basic liberty and called it Universal Health care, and we watched them do that to us on Christmas Eve, with every Republican locked out of the deliberations.

We watched a majority political party rape the Constitution and enslave us all in impossible debt in an expanding Federal Government that now recognizes no limits to its power, and scorns the Constitution. Every perpetrator has sworn to uphold, defend and protect Constitution and Country, and they have instead abuse us all, and have shown us great contempt and disregard.

I have come up with a set of ideas that will make it impossible, for a time, for our legislators to again savage our Constitution, and burden us with disastrous programs due to poorly studied legislation.

I propose six things to stem that tide or corruption.



1.CONSTITUTION TEST, FEDERAL AND STATE: Congress should seat no elected representative who cannot score a 95% on a test of the U.S. Constitution and of his/her own state Constitution.


2.MANDATORY DEFENSE OF CONSTITUTIONALITY: No legislation may come to the floor for discussion unless accompanied by a defense of its Constitutionality. Paul Ryan has already proposed this at the Federal level.

3.MANDATORY IMPACT STATEMENT: No legislation may come to the floor for discussion unless accompanied by a complete impact statement:
1.who it affects
1.who benefits, and why
2.who is harmed, and why
2.every person who crafts and drafts a bill MUST BE NAMED: aides, consultants, lobbyists. EVERYONE.

3.what are possible unintended consequences of it
the affected area of impact are duly apprised of the impacts and are made aware of said impact before legislation comes to a vote.

4.No one may vote on this legislation until they have passed a test on the impact statement, again, 95% correct or better.

4.MANDATORY COMMITTEE READING AND TEST OF COMPREHENSION: No Legislator may cast a vote on legislation that he has not read

1.legislation must be completely read and understood by a committee, and the CBO should prepare a test that covers all aspects of the legislation.
2.every legislator whose name is affixed to the bill in committee must pass a test at 95% or better that shows he or she understands the bill
3.the bill cannot come out of committee unless ALL the legislators on it have passed that test at that level

5.MANDATORY TEST BEFORE VOTE: No Legislator may cast a vote on legislation unless he has passed a review test of it at a minimum score of 95%

6.MANDATORY PUBLIC HEARINGS: No legislation may come to a vote until
1.the particulars are made known to the public
2.the scores of Legislators' tests are made public
3.the names of all who wrote or worked on the legislation have been made public, and their scores on the test of the legislations import and meaning


I know that these ideas are improvements that may well save Congress from itself, and save us from legislators. If you like them, own them, and pass them on! Every legislator in this country should be so bound and tested.

Blessing on you and yours, and God help our troubled nation.