|
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
James Bridge is still waiting for you to join LinkedIn
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Reminder about your invitation from James Bridge
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunday, August 26, 2012
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Joe Kaufman
We support Joe for his bid to upset Debra Wasswerman-Schultz in the Florida 20th.
Click on the above link, and read about it!
Don Stenberg for U.S. Senate, Nebraska
Go to Hear Us Now USA and read about the 2012 Senate Race in Nebraska
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Same-sex Marriage and “Gay” Politics: So Wrong in So Many Ways
Same-sex Marriage and "Gay" Politics: So Wrong in So Many Ways
by James A. Bridge
In the year 2011 we see a society and a national government in the United States in complete convulsion and in conflict with its larger self.
New York's Governor Mario Cuomo is prepared to sign into law the redefinition of marriage in the Empire State. The state's motto is, translated from Latin, "Higher, Higher!" I don't think New York's legislature has any problem being high, but I'm sure the "excelsior" motto was not intended for tokers and other drug abusers. New Yorkers deserve far better from their government than they have received at the hands of these bankrupting dastards and reflex-liberal ne'er-do-wells.
The pacific ocean of a complacent and tolerant majority culture and religion has eructed forth a bilious tidal wave of contrary impulse, at a time when Americans chose its national leader and legislatures poorly. This wave would alter the landscape of the society through a synchronously biased news and entertainment message, through control of the national political order, and even in the pews of synagogues and churches across the country.
Perhaps the most offensive of these is the "Gay" political movement and the push for same-sex marriage. And perhaps the most telling flaw in a permissive society is permitting that to continue which would destroy that lenient majority.
The goal of gays has demonstrable intensified to not just being left alone, and to be free of prosecution under blue laws that define sexual conduct. The goal is now two-fold: One, to change the nature of their sexual proclivities by redefining and destroying the heterosexual world, what its definitions are, and what is paramount to its continuation. Two, to get their barefaced lie of "as normal as you" into public schools. And they are succeeding.
Under the guise of protecting gays from bullying, gay awareness is being pushed into sex-education classes, and in special assemblies. Federal programs drive this, and under the 111th Congress, run by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, there is no surprise—she regularly takes money from the Man Boy Love Association. You could check it out and find I'm right.
Why is that wrong, some of you may ask, for a politician to take money from a group that espouses statutory rape? Could there be anything more obviously wrong? Starkist also contributes to Pelosi; one would wonder, what do Starkist and statutory rape have in common?
They have a corrupt politician in common, who should be excommunicated from her place of worship, so vilely amoral is she. She is, however, a news media sacred cow. Imagine a Republican taking money from such a loathsome group! But we are on to you, Nancy, and all of your pals.
Gay as a political movement is wrong, because it drives a political agenda at preteens and teenagers. No political movement of any kind is truly appropriate in public schools, other than allegiance to one's state and country. Forcing that conversation about homosexuality upon our prepubescent young is inappropriate and serves no purpose other than to assuage a segment of society that is obsessed with its own sexuality.
The "Gay" political movement is in and of itself an affront to society. Not the fact of homosexuality: humans produce a certain number of sexually disoriented people. Our system of law and the political culture of the United States of America is tolerant of different. I, for one, refuse to pass judgment. However, there can be no political movement centered around a sex act; or rather, any such political movement is inherently ridiculous and inappropriate. Homosexual people don't all see the world from a genital point of view, but in evidence is the preponderance of in-your-face political ideology that is often intended to offend members of the heterosexual majority.
Would you like the proof of the argument I make? Here it is: There will NEVER be a heterosexual political movement based upon having sex a certain way.
Why?
Because it is NOBODY'S BUSINESS, and we don't want to hear about it from you, either, homo- or heterosexually. These kinds of conversions are inherently intimate, and should never be broadcast. The homosexual political movement and agenda is actually by definition pornographic.
The further affront of such a political movement is to drive the political discussion into the minds of the young. The forces of "Gay" have as a goal Public Schools. You could ask our President's "Safe Schools" czar Kevin Jennings, who has recently resigned (probably to avoid being further negative ballast for the President's re-election bid). There will be "Safe School" legislation that is in fact a Trojan Horse for "gay awareness" teaching and for "anti-gay" bullying. Children who are not homosexual will have to confront sexuality long before they need to have to think about it, all so that this sex-act-centric political movement can put the fact of its own homosexual identity on full display before them.
Nor is the discussion of same-sex marriage about equality. Marriage is ancient, it is sacred, it is understood globally as heterosexual, embraced my many, eschewed by few, and not all succeed or lead to happiness. Marriage is the expression of the normal, human desire for other-sex companionship. Whether that union produces offspring is not germane: that is marriage. Marriage is also sacred before God, if you believe in God. If you don't, one would hope you would think a little deeper about the insignificance of the world, in the context of an infinitely expanding universe of which in comparison we are but specks on a speck of wet space dust.
Homosexual activists are not content to be different; that is the over-weening purpose of the gay marriage movement. They want to alter the majority society in its own image. They no longer want to be a minority, or a subset of humanity. What they fail to grasp is that they will always be, as they always have been, different. And many homosexual people, due to their other-orientation, have personalities that do not fit in well with others who are not homosexual. Gay people will admit this to themselves, certainly.
The Gay Marriage movement is also a lie: Homosexual people can very easily "marry." All one has to do is find a gay-friendly or an actually homosexual priest or rabbi, and a competent lawyer. Sign mutual power-of-attorney documents and enter them in the court records, step one. Step two, have a blessing performed, and choose your setting. Invite me, I'll even bring a present! There, you have it: a homosexual union that is as binding as you want it to be.
But Americans know that politics and sex don't mix well. Go ask Anthony Weiner....Jim McGreevey...John Edwards...Bill Clinton...and on, and on, and on.
Anyone with either a finger to the wind or an ear to the ground knows that the formerly permissive great majority of Americans are at an end of patience. The now completely exposed animus of the forces of big government in partnership with a corrupted news and entertainment media, of the forces of anti-Jewish, anti-Christian religion and immorality generally has created a coiling backlash that certainly will reach epic proportions.
Fast forward to 2012. See you in the streets on November 7th.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Legislative Testing
Legislation Testing
by James Andrew Bridge
How many legislators could pass a test on the United States Constitution? On their own state Constitution? How many could pass a test on legislation they vote on?
Don't you think they should be able to? Or are we condemned to vote for politicians who are ignorant of our Constitution, and who don't give a damn about what their legislation will do to us and our children?
We all watched as the 111th Congress quadrupled the debt—after excoriating the previous President for his modest one—to a real number of $14 trillion, or $186,000 per household. We watched as the that Congress in concert with our President Obama stripped us of our basic liberty and called it Universal Health care, and we watched them do that to us on Christmas Eve, with every Republican locked out of the deliberations.
We watched a majority political party rape the Constitution and enslave us all in impossible debt in an expanding Federal Government that now recognizes no limits to its power, and scorns the Constitution. Every perpetrator has sworn to uphold, defend and protect Constitution and Country, and they have instead abuse us all, and have shown us great contempt and disregard.
I have come up with a set of ideas that will make it impossible, for a time, for our legislators to again savage our Constitution, and burden us with disastrous programs due to poorly studied legislation.
I propose six things to stem that tide or corruption.
1.CONSTITUTION TEST, FEDERAL AND STATE: Congress should seat no elected representative who cannot score a 95% on a test of the U.S. Constitution and of his/her own state Constitution.
2.MANDATORY DEFENSE OF CONSTITUTIONALITY: No legislation may come to the floor for discussion unless accompanied by a defense of its Constitutionality. Paul Ryan has already proposed this at the Federal level.
3.MANDATORY IMPACT STATEMENT: No legislation may come to the floor for discussion unless accompanied by a complete impact statement:
1.who it affects
1.who benefits, and why
2.who is harmed, and why
2.every person who crafts and drafts a bill MUST BE NAMED: aides, consultants, lobbyists. EVERYONE.
3.what are possible unintended consequences of it
the affected area of impact are duly apprised of the impacts and are made aware of said impact before legislation comes to a vote.
4.No one may vote on this legislation until they have passed a test on the impact statement, again, 95% correct or better.
4.MANDATORY COMMITTEE READING AND TEST OF COMPREHENSION: No Legislator may cast a vote on legislation that he has not read
1.legislation must be completely read and understood by a committee, and the CBO should prepare a test that covers all aspects of the legislation.
2.every legislator whose name is affixed to the bill in committee must pass a test at 95% or better that shows he or she understands the bill
3.the bill cannot come out of committee unless ALL the legislators on it have passed that test at that level
5.MANDATORY TEST BEFORE VOTE: No Legislator may cast a vote on legislation unless he has passed a review test of it at a minimum score of 95%
6.MANDATORY PUBLIC HEARINGS: No legislation may come to a vote until
1.the particulars are made known to the public
2.the scores of Legislators' tests are made public
3.the names of all who wrote or worked on the legislation have been made public, and their scores on the test of the legislations import and meaning
I know that these ideas are improvements that may well save Congress from itself, and save us from legislators. If you like them, own them, and pass them on! Every legislator in this country should be so bound and tested.
Blessing on you and yours, and God help our troubled nation.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
GOP: Tell Obama To Get Off Health Care
by James A. Bridge
STAND FIRM, Congressional Republicans! Tell President Obama the Health Care debate is OVER. Now, let's talk Fiscal Responsibility.
We are at war. And we Conservatives are winning. Liberty is on millions of lips, as is disdain for a man who holds the highest elected office in the land, an office he achieved through misleading most of the people who voted for him. He has attacked the very fiber of our Constitution and way of life. He is boosting the size of government at every opportunity, adding government jobs that will create an unsustainable tax burden upon us all, and particularly upon on entrepreneurs, who hire about 80 percent of the employees in this country.
We are at war. A political war, a war of words, but the stakes are high, and now, the tide has turned in our favor. We know that a man who trashes profit and wealth is a Marxist, and that he who so does cannot take us to prosperity. Prosperity and Liberty are twins, and the wealth of a nation can only arrive through expanding opportunity for free enterprise and profit.
The American people have taken to the streets, have swarmed to Washington, have come to town hall meetings, and have voted, to tell Democrats to get away from those un-American policies and ideals put forward by President Obama and the statist/socialist/Marxist leadership of the Democrat Party.
How did these people in control of the White House and this most disgraceful 111th Congress of the United States answer us?
President Obama told us to “get out of the way.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid forced us to swallow a Senate approval of “ObamaCare” on Christmas Eve, an event not even celebrated by this White House, whose “holiday tree” sported Christmas tree ornaments decorated with the image of Mao Zedong.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has sent her husband, her children, and her grandchildren around the world on military jets, at a cost to us of MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
How have we answered these affronts? In Virginia, and in New Jersey, the people spoke and elected Republicans. Most recently, the people of the great Bay State spoke, and they corrected the Democrats who thought the open Senate seat belonged to Ted Kennedy. Scott Brown told them it was their seat; the people of Massachusetts agreed, and gave it to him to use to create private sector jobs, to stop this mad attack upon AMERICAN LIBERTY and this horrific, staggering, deficit spending, and to stop aiding and abetting terrorists by Mirandizing them!
Yet the President extends a hand, and says, “help me pass some kind of health care reform.” NO. Courage, men and women of the Republican Party. Blunt not thy swords, nor weaken your advantage! Stand firm!
And press on.
In the Civil War, Union generals couldn't understand how to pressure the wounded foe. They were at war, a terrible war between brothers, yet commanders like George McClelland wouldn't press advantage.
President Lincoln, and Generals Ulysses Grant and William Sherman understood how to push ahead with advantage, relentlessly. This is how the Civil War was won.
We have the high ground—as a minority! Force this President to cut his world-historical budget deficits. Stop him from adding jobs to the federal government, to end his rape of our Constitution.
Obama tells Americans that they have been wrong our household deficit spending—then he proposes a record breaking budget deficit for the second year in a row, and plans to expand the size of the federal government to nearly 25% of our Gross Domestic Product!
He wants to pass this growth off to us in the form of $1.4 Trillion in new taxes over the next 10 years! MORE TAXES IN A TIME OF 20% unemployment! Further, he and Congress have approved a new debt ceiling of $14+ Trillion! Madness! Or, a plan to destroy our economy and way of life by making it all unsustainable, unto the point of collapse. This budget already includes all measures to implement the forced Carbon-police of Cap and Trade, as if already law. Stop him!
STAND FIRM, GOP! Tell President Obama the Health Care debate is OVER. We'll meet you half way on spending. CUT OUR NATIONAL DEBT IN HALF, AND YOUR BIG GOVERNMENT 2010 BUDGET.
Health Care is no longer on the table.
semper porro, nunquam cedere!
![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png)